Court revokes Abdulrasheed Maina’s bail, issues bench warrant

Court revokes Abdulrasheed Maina’s bail, issues bench warrant

Absence of judge stalls Maina, Nyako’s trial
Maina

The Federal High Court, Abuja, on Wednesday, ordered the revocation of Abdulrasheed Maina, former Chairman, defunct Pension Reformed Task Team (PRTT)’s bail.

Justice Okon Abang, who gave the order in a ruling, also issued a bench warrant for Maina’s arrest “anywhere he is sighted.”

Maina (1st defendant) was arraigned before Justice Abang, on Oct. 25, 2019, by the EFCC alongside his son, Faisal, and firm, Common Input Property and Investment Ltd.

Although he is facing 12-counts bordering on money laundering, he had pleaded not guilty to all the charges.

The former pension reformed boss was on July released from Kuje Prison nine months after his detention.

The court had, on Nov. 25, 2019, admitted Maina to a bail in the sum of N1 billion with two sureties who must be serving senators.

The judge ruled that the two sureties, who must be prepared for a N500 million bond each, must always be in court with the defendant at each adjourned date.

He added that the sureties should not have a criminal case pending in any court and must have landed property fully developed in Maitama, Asokoro, Wuse II, Katampe or Central Business Districts of Abuja, with Certificate of Occupancy attached as evidence.

ALSO READ: Kinsmen disagree with Senator Ndume over Maina’s whereabouts

He also ruled that the senators though would always come to the court at every adjourned date, the lawmakers only needed to come and sign a court register that would be opened at the registry, among other terms.

The judge said the conditions were hinged on the anti-corruption agency’s allegations that Maina had multiple international passports and that prior to his arrest, he sneaked into the country from Niger Republic, among others.

But due to his inability to meet the bail terms, Justice Abang, on Jan. 29, further varied the bail conditions.

Abang reduced Maina’s bail condition from N1 billion to N500 million with a surety in the like sum who must be a serving senator as opposed to the earlier order of producing two serving senators.

back link building services=0></a></div><p>Sen. Ali Ndume, who represents Borno South Senatorial District where Maina hails from, decided to depose to an affidavit to always bring him to court at every adjourned date or forfeit the N500 million bail bond.</p><p>However, after Maina’s release, he had been absent from court since the trial resumed on Sept. 29, even though Ndume was always in court.</p><p>The senator had, on Oct. 2, told the court that he did not know Maina’s whereabouts.</p><p>At the resumed trial on Wednesday, the EFCC’s Lawyer, Mohammed Abubakar, said though the matter was for further cross examination of PW6, “in view of the absence of the 1st defendant (Maina) in court, we apply that the matter should proceed in his absentia.”</p><p>“This application is brought pursuant to Section 352(4) of ACJA 2015.</p><p>“It our humble submission that from this provision, there are only two conditions to be met for the grant of the application.</p><p>“First, the defendant who is absent from court is on bail and he is absent without reasonable explanation .</p><p>“Secondly, there shall be two court sittings without the presence of the defendant and without reasonable explanation,” he said.</p><p>Abubakar argued that Maina was released on bail by this the court and in disregard of the court order, he had absented himself without reasonable explanation to at least four adjournment.</p><p>According to him, the 1st defendant was absent from court on Sept. 29, Sept. 30th, Oct. 2 and Oct. 19.</p><p>“We submit that on all these four occasions, this court had ruled that the absence of the 1st defendant from court on those days was without reasonable explanation,” he reminded.</p><p>The lawyer also applied for the revocation of his bail and issuance of bench warrant for his arrest.</p><p>Abubakar, in addition, applied that Ndume, who stood as surety for him, should forfeit the bail bond and the landed property, and that if he was unable to comply, he should be remanded until he was able to meet the terms.</p><p>He said he relied on Section 179(1) of Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA) 2015 in making the application.</p><p>“I rely on making this submission on the record of this court and the submission made by my learned colleague on the last adjourned date.</p><p>“We urge this honourable court to grant these applications,” he said.</p><p>Mark Agbo, Counsel to Maina, said though he was not opposed to the anti-graft agency’s plea for his client to be tried in absentia, he disagreed on the applications for his bail revocation and forfeiture of bail bond.</p><p>“We submit that this is a court of record and an application ought to have been filed on bail revocation and forfeiture of bail bond,” he said.</p><div class='code-block code-block-5' style='margin: 8px 0; clear: both;'> <a href=https://www.adhang.com/guest-posting-services/ ><img class=lazy src=